PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APP vs. GTT.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APP vs. GTT.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

APP is traded in USD, while GTT.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the GTT.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APP achieves a -26.28% return, which is significantly lower than GTT.PA's 27.78% return.


APP

1D
3.80%
1M
2.39%
YTD
-26.28%
6M
-25.93%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
180.45%
5Y*
43.23%
10Y*

GTT.PA

1D
1.19%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
27.78%
6M
24.89%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
37.19%
5Y*
26.67%
10Y*
27.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APP vs. GTT.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-26.28%108.08%712.62%278.44%-88.83%34.66%
GTT.PA
Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS
27.78%44.76%5.70%27.88%17.40%15.96%

Correlation

The correlation between APP and GTT.PA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APP vs. GTT.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APP
APP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GTT.PA
GTT.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GTT.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APP vs. GTT.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APPGTT.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.21

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

5.01

-3.78

APP vs. GTT.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APP Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the GTT.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APP and GTT.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APP vs. GTT.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than GTT.PA's maximum drawdown of -62.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APP and GTT.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APPGTT.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.90%

-62.30%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.99%

-13.37%

-36.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.00%

-22.35%

-34.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

-31.29%

-60.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.28%

-5.18%

-27.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-15.37%

-27.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.10%

5.94%

+19.16%

Volatility

APP vs. GTT.PA - Volatility Comparison

AppLovin Corporation (APP) has a higher volatility of 20.54% compared to Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) at 6.64%. This indicates that APP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTT.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APPGTT.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.54%

6.64%

+13.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

17.41%

+41.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.03%

24.33%

+46.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.84%

29.18%

+48.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.53%

32.12%

+45.41%

Dividends

APP vs. GTT.PA - Dividend Comparison

APP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTT.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APP
AppLovin Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTT.PA
Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS
3.85%5.00%4.81%2.84%3.31%3.82%5.37%3.85%3.96%5.31%6.55%6.31%

Financials

APP vs. GTT.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AppLovin Corporation and Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. APP values in USD, GTT.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


APP and GTT.PA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APP and GTT.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer