APLZ vs. DOG
APLZ (Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - APLZ tracks the Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APLZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
APLZ vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APLZ
- 1D
- 21.29%
- 1M
- -13.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- -8.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.36%
- 10Y*
- -11.12%
APLZ vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | -85.33% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLZ and DOG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLZ vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
APLZ
DOG
APLZ vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APLZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.57 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
APLZ vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.78% | -92.73% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.79% | -92.62% | +4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.63% | -66.40% | +12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.98% | — |
Volatility
APLZ vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 229.43% | 12.32% | +217.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 229.43% | 14.81% | +214.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.43% | 17.50% | +211.93% |
APLZ vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLZ vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
APLZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.50% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLZ and DOG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.00% for APLZ.
APLZ tracks Applied Digital Corporation (APLD), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 0.95% for DOG.
Find the right allocation for APLZ and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer