PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLZ vs. DOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLZ vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APLZ

1D
21.29%
1M
-13.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOG

1D
1.45%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-4.36%
6M
-4.24%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
-8.54%
5Y*
-5.36%
10Y*
-11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLZ vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APLZ and DOG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLZ vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLZ

DOG
DOG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLZ vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APLZ vs. DOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLZDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

-0.57

+0.13

Drawdowns

APLZ vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and DOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLZDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.78%

-92.73%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.79%

-92.62%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.63%

-66.40%

+12.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.98%

Volatility

APLZ vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLZDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

229.43%

12.32%

+217.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

229.43%

14.81%

+214.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

229.43%

17.50%

+211.93%

APLZ vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLZ vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

APLZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
APLZ
Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
3.50%3.65%5.72%4.54%0.41%0.00%0.14%1.54%0.86%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


APLZ and DOG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.00% for APLZ.

APLZ tracks Applied Digital Corporation (APLD), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 0.95% for DOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLZ and DOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer