APLZ vs. ZIVB
APLZ (Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. APLZ is passively managed, while ZIVB is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. APLZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APLZ
- 1D
- 5.04%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | 25.07% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLZ and ZIVB is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.78% | 0.00% | -91.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.49% | 0.00% | -89.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.58% | 0.00% | -57.58% |
Volatility
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.87% | 106.85% | +113.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.87% | 106.85% | +113.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.87% | 106.85% | +113.02% |
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
APLZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
APLZ Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF | 0.00% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLZ and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZIVB is cheaper at 1.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZIVB is cheaper with a 1.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.
ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for APLZ.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for APLZ and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer