PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLZ vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


APLZ

1D
5.04%
1M
4.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APLZ and ZIVB is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short APLD Daily ETF (APLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLZ drawdown since its inception was -91.78%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLZ and ZIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLZZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.78%

0.00%

-91.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.49%

0.00%

-89.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.58%

0.00%

-57.58%

Volatility

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLZZIVBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.87%

106.85%

+113.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.87%

106.85%

+113.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

219.87%

106.85%

+113.02%

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

APLZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APLZ and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZIVB is cheaper at 1.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZIVB is cheaper with a 1.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for APLZ.

ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for APLZ.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for APLZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLZ and ZIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer