APLX vs. CRMG
APLX (Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. APLX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
APLX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLX achieves a 80.67% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.
APLX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 80.67%
- 6M
- 57.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -29.64%
- YTD
- -71.26%
- 6M
- -71.01%
- 1Y
- -73.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APLX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APLX Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF | 80.67% | 83.15% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -71.26% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLX and CRMG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
APLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
APLX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF (APLX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APLX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLX drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLX and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.39% | -79.83% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.67% | -78.97% | +36.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.30% | -39.18% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.41% | — |
Volatility
APLX vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 214.39% | 76.12% | +138.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 214.39% | 75.39% | +139.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 214.39% | 75.39% | +139.00% |
APLX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
APLX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
APLX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither APLX nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
APLX and CRMG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for APLX.
APLX and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for APLX and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for APLX and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer