PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLX vs. SMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLX vs. SMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF (APLX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLX achieves a 80.91% return, which is significantly higher than SMU's -65.34% return.


APLX

1D
-5.43%
1M
-8.58%
YTD
80.91%
6M
38.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMU

1D
-8.13%
1M
-13.60%
YTD
-65.34%
6M
-74.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLX vs. SMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
APLX
Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF
80.91%83.15%
SMU
Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF
-65.34%-89.13%

Correlation

The correlation between APLX and SMU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLX vs. SMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF (APLX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APLX vs. SMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLX vs. SMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLX drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, smaller than the maximum SMU drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLX and SMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLXSMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-98.96%

+14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.60%

-98.53%

+55.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.32%

-76.71%

+31.39%

Volatility

APLX vs. SMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLXSMUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

214.93%

204.83%

+10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

214.93%

204.83%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

214.93%

204.83%

+10.10%

APLX vs. SMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APLX and SMU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

APLX vs. SMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLX nor SMU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APLX and SMU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APLX and SMU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

APLX and SMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLX and SMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer