PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLX vs. CIFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF (APLX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLX achieves a 85.45% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 92.34% return.


APLX

1D
-12.57%
1M
39.18%
YTD
85.45%
6M
13.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIFG

1D
-0.35%
1M
94.51%
YTD
92.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
APLX
Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF
85.45%-43.84%
CIFG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF
92.34%-42.39%

Correlation

The correlation between APLX and CIFG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF (APLX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APLX vs. CIFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLXCIFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.12

+1.67

Drawdowns

APLX vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLX drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLX and CIFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLXCIFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-71.71%

-12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.16%

-0.35%

-40.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.49%

-38.01%

-7.48%

Volatility

APLX vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLXCIFGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.24%

203.83%

+14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.24%

203.83%

+14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

218.24%

203.83%

+14.41%

APLX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


APLX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for APLX.

APLX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for APLX and 0.75% for CIFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLX and CIFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer