PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLD vs. LQDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APLD vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA's 143.87% return.


APLD

1D
-2.07%
1M
-22.89%
6M
-19.16%
YTD
11.70%
1Y
108.45%
3Y*
43.55%
5Y*
84.53%
10Y*
111.35%
ALL TIME*
26.17%

LQDA

1D
-3.10%
1M
6.04%
6M
98.42%
YTD
143.87%
1Y
350.03%
3Y*
120.93%
5Y*
105.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.03M$590.08M$826.73M
$129.21M$115.99M$136.40M

APLD vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
11.70%220.94%13.35%266.30%-56.09%11,789.90%389.44%-34.55%-18.52%
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
143.87%193.28%-2.24%88.85%30.80%65.08%-30.99%-80.26%73.98%

Correlation

The correlation between APLD and LQDA is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APLD:

$7.83B

LQDA:

$7.48B

EPS

APLD:

-$0.91

LQDA:

$0.23

PS Ratio

APLD:

12.10

LQDA:

27.98

PB Ratio

APLD:

4.57

LQDA:

78.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

APLD:

$611.31M

LQDA:

$288.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

APLD:

$214.45M

LQDA:

$275.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

APLD:

-$158.14M

LQDA:

$51.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLD vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDA
LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APLD vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLDLQDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.56

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

9.89

-7.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

25.71

-21.15

APLD vs. LQDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the LQDA Sharpe Ratio of 5.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLD and LQDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLD vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.73%, which is greater than LQDA's maximum drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and LQDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLDLQDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.73%

-93.87%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.23%

-35.66%

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.95%

-46.80%

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

-55.36%

-27.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.83%

-5.53%

-39.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.51%

-68.43%

-6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.87%

13.69%

+10.18%

Volatility

APLD vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison

Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 32.97% compared to Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) at 19.04%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLDLQDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.97%

19.04%

+13.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.00%

48.97%

+27.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.72%

66.53%

+43.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

164.94%

74.06%

+90.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

301.14%

85.46%

+215.68%

Dividends

APLD vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLD nor LQDA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

APLD vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

APLD vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Digital Corporation and Liquidia Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

APLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 126.00M and revenue of 293.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

LQDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.

APLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -114.82M and revenue of 293.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -39.1%.

LQDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

APLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -111.58M and revenue of 293.87M, resulting in a net margin of -38.0%.

LQDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APLD and LQDA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLD has higher volatility (32.97%) compared to LQDA (19.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.73% vs LQDA's -93.87%.

LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.31 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLD and LQDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer