PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLD vs. HYMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APLD vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a 74.14% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 8.37% return.


APLD

1D
2.97%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
74.14%
6M
53.27%
1Y
241.33%
3Y*
69.23%
5Y*
112.30%
10Y*
125.13%

HYMC

1D
2.26%
1M
-40.96%
YTD
8.37%
6M
92.24%
1Y
657.65%
3Y*
98.71%
5Y*
-6.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLD vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
74.14%220.94%13.35%266.30%-56.09%11,789.90%389.44%-34.55%120.00%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
8.37%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between APLD and HYMC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APLD:

$11.60B

HYMC:

$2.31B

EPS

APLD:

-$0.72

HYMC:

-$1.64

PB Ratio

APLD:

7.37

HYMC:

10.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

APLD:

$390.57M

HYMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

APLD:

$124.93M

HYMC:

-$4.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

APLD:

-$154.66M

HYMC:

-$69.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLD vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLD vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLDHYMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

11.29

-6.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

30.24

-18.52

APLD vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 5.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLD and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLD vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.73%, roughly equal to the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and HYMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLDHYMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.73%

-98.89%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.31%

-58.77%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.66%

-63.45%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

-94.96%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.00%

-83.72%

+69.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.86%

-63.36%

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.22%

21.95%

-0.73%

Volatility

APLD vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) at 24.71%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLDHYMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.15%

24.71%

+8.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.49%

95.63%

-15.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.13%

120.00%

-12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

165.20%

152.60%

+12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

301.46%

122.97%

+178.49%

Dividends

APLD vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLD nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

APLD vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
161.76M
0
(APLD) Total Revenue
(HYMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APLD and HYMC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLD has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to HYMC (24.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.73% vs HYMC's -98.89%.

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLD and HYMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer