APLD vs. ANAB
APLD (Applied Digital Corporation) and ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.) are both stocks. APLD operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while ANAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, APLD returned 111.39%/yr vs 26.26%/yr for ANAB. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APLD vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a 66.99% return, which is significantly higher than ANAB's 58.91% return.
APLD
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 66.99%
- 6M
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 195.42%
- 3Y*
- 72.37%
- 5Y*
- 111.39%
- 10Y*
- 120.60%
ANAB
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -25.92%
- YTD
- 58.91%
- 6M
- 73.08%
- 1Y
- 225.06%
- 3Y*
- 60.31%
- 5Y*
- 26.26%
- 10Y*
- —
APLD vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLD Applied Digital Corporation | 66.99% | 220.94% | 13.35% | 266.30% | -56.09% | 11,789.90% | 389.44% | -34.55% | 64.99% | -48.72% |
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc. | 58.91% | 266.16% | -38.19% | -30.88% | -10.82% | 61.63% | 32.31% | -74.53% | -36.67% | 492.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLD and ANAB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2017 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
APLD:
$11.12B
ANAB:
$1.47B
APLD:
-$0.72
ANAB:
-$0.91
APLD:
27.75
ANAB:
6.51
APLD:
7.06
ANAB:
115.60
APLD:
$390.57M
ANAB:
$232.39M
APLD:
$124.93M
ANAB:
$245.59M
APLD:
-$154.66M
ANAB:
$52.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLD vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank
APLD
ANAB
APLD vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APLD | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 8.05 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 20.07 | -10.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APLD | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 3.29 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.40 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.23 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
APLD vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, which is greater than ANAB's maximum drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and ANAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLD | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.70% | -92.08% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.31% | -28.15% | -22.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.66% | -69.32% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.61% | -69.32% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.53% | -40.07% | +22.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.49% | -64.71% | -9.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.15% | 11.27% | +10.88% |
Volatility
APLD vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison
Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 32.64% compared to AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) at 12.10%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLD | ANAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.64% | 12.10% | +20.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.09% | 46.22% | +33.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.26% | 68.91% | +38.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 165.20% | 65.30% | +99.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 301.59% | 75.47% | +226.12% |
Dividends
APLD vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison
Neither APLD nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
APLD vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
APLD and ANAB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APLD has higher volatility (32.64%) compared to ANAB (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.70% vs ANAB's -92.08%.
ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APLD and ANAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer