PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APIE vs. APCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APIE vs. APCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APIE achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than APCB's 0.29% return.


APIE

1D
-1.51%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.11%
6M
9.61%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10Y*

APCB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APIE vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
APIE
ActivePassive International Equity ETF
8.11%31.46%7.37%7.98%
APCB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
0.29%6.87%1.45%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between APIE and APCB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023

0.28

APIE vs. APCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
APIE
APCB

Technology

21.5%
100.0%

Financial Services

19.9%

-

Industrials

14.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Healthcare

9.2%

-

Communication Services

7.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Technology

APIE
21.5%
APCB
100.0%

Financial Services

APIE
19.9%
APCB

-

Industrials

APIE
14.4%
APCB

-

Consumer Cyclical

APIE
9.8%
APCB

-

Healthcare

APIE
9.2%
APCB

-

Communication Services

APIE
7.2%
APCB

-

Consumer Defensive

APIE
5.7%
APCB

-

Basic Materials

APIE
5.4%
APCB

-

Energy

APIE
3.4%
APCB

-

Utilities

APIE
2.7%
APCB

-

Real Estate

APIE
0.6%
APCB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APIE vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APIE
APIE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
APIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
APIE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
APIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
APIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

APCB
APCB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APIE vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APIEAPCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.87

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

5.64

+1.13

APIE vs. APCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the APCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APIE and APCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APIEAPCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.41

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.68

+0.37

Drawdowns

APIE vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APIE drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than APCB's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APIE and APCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APIEAPCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-6.42%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-2.58%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.94%

-5.32%

-10.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.41%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-1.51%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

0.86%

+2.51%

Volatility

APIE vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison

ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) at 1.22%. This indicates that APIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APIEAPCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

1.22%

+4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

2.42%

+10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

3.43%

+12.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

4.84%

+11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

4.84%

+11.99%

APIE vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

APIE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than APCB's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

APIE vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison

APIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than APCB's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APCB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
4.35%4.35%4.74%2.22%
APIE
ActivePassive International Equity ETF
3.43%3.71%2.14%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


APIE and APCB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APIE has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to APCB (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APIE dropped -15.94% vs APCB's -6.42%.

On 3-year performance, APIE leads with 17.90% vs 3.96% for APCB. On fees, APCB is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, APCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, APIE has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APCB is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for APIE.

APCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 3.43% for APIE.

APIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while APCB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for APIE and 0.36% for APCB.

APIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APIE and APCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer