PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. IVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APH vs. IVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APH having a 6.47% return and IVZ slightly higher at 6.54%. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed IVZ with an annualized return of 26.67%, while IVZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


APH

1D
3.45%
1M
12.16%
YTD
6.47%
6M
2.93%
1Y
54.90%
3Y*
55.57%
5Y*
34.64%
10Y*
26.67%

IVZ

1D
0.73%
1M
0.64%
YTD
6.54%
6M
8.44%
1Y
98.16%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APH vs. IVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APH
Amphenol Corporation
6.47%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
6.54%56.94%3.02%6.05%-18.71%35.56%3.06%14.91%-52.05%24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between APH and IVZ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 1995

0.44

The correlation between APH and IVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

APH:

$4.58

IVZ:

-$0.62

PS Ratio

APH:

7.11

IVZ:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$25.90B

IVZ:

$6.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$9.67B

IVZ:

$2.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$7.45B

IVZ:

$1.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APH vs. IVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IVZ
IVZ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APH vs. IVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APHIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

4.48

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

12.09

-7.03

APH vs. IVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the IVZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and IVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APHIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.82

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.11

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.11

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.18

+0.45

Drawdowns

APH vs. IVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum IVZ drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and IVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-83.91%

+20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-22.03%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-36.52%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-53.40%

+24.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-79.72%

+42.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.45%

-4.93%

-8.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-36.00%

+22.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.87%

8.15%

+2.72%

Volatility

APH vs. IVZ - Volatility Comparison

Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) at 9.52%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

9.52%

+7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.53%

25.49%

+11.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

35.09%

+5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

36.58%

-6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

39.41%

-11.58%

Dividends

APH vs. IVZ - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than IVZ's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.58%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
3.07%3.18%4.66%6.15%4.07%2.89%4.45%6.84%7.11%3.15%3.66%3.17%

Financials

APH vs. IVZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Invesco Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.62B
1.69B
(APH) Total Revenue
(IVZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APH vs. IVZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amphenol Corporation and Invesco Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
67.0%
Portfolio components
APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

IVZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 1.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

IVZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Ltd. reported an operating income of -1.46B and revenue of 1.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -86.2%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

IVZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Ltd. reported a net income of -1.06B and revenue of 1.69B, resulting in a net margin of -62.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APH and IVZ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APH has higher volatility (16.86%) compared to IVZ (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs IVZ's -83.91%.

IVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APH and IVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer