PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APH vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 44.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with APH having a 28.29% annualized return and IBKR not far behind at 26.98%.


APH

1D
3.11%
1M
26.87%
YTD
17.58%
6M
22.56%
1Y
72.68%
3Y*
58.07%
5Y*
37.31%
10Y*
28.29%

IBKR

1D
2.15%
1M
6.73%
YTD
44.54%
6M
47.85%
1Y
84.38%
3Y*
67.46%
5Y*
42.22%
10Y*
26.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APH vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APH
Amphenol Corporation
17.58%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
44.54%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%31.12%31.71%-14.01%-7.13%63.75%

Correlation

The correlation between APH and IBKR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APH:

$204.53B

IBKR:

$41.59B

EPS

APH:

$4.58

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

APH:

34.59

IBKR:

24.70

PEG Ratio

APH:

1.15

IBKR:

0.85

PS Ratio

APH:

7.85

IBKR:

4.76

PB Ratio

APH:

14.63

IBKR:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$25.90B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$9.67B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$7.45B

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APH vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APH vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APHIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

4.54

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

11.52

-4.85

APH vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APH vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, roughly equal to the maximum IBKR drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-63.66%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-18.70%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-38.66%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-38.66%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-55.09%

+17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

0.00%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-24.84%

+11.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

7.35%

+3.57%

Volatility

APH vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 15.42% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 10.93%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.42%

10.93%

+4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.51%

27.86%

+9.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.76%

37.75%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.79%

34.51%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.96%

33.37%

-5.41%

Dividends

APH vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than IBKR's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.52%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.35%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%

Financials

APH vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.62B
765.00M
(APH) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APH and IBKR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APH has higher volatility (15.42%) compared to IBKR (10.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APH and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer