APH vs. CSW
APH (Amphenol Corporation) and CSW (CSW Industrials Inc) are both stocks. APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while CSW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APH vs. CSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than CSW's -8.76% return.
APH
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- 12.16%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 54.90%
- 3Y*
- 55.57%
- 5Y*
- 34.64%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
CSW
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -8.76%
- 6M
- -9.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APH vs. CSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 6.47% | 46.11% |
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | -8.76% | -2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and CSW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
APH:
$185.20B
CSW:
$4.47B
APH:
$4.58
CSW:
$6.68
APH:
31.32
CSW:
39.99
APH:
1.04
CSW:
2.60
APH:
7.11
CSW:
4.14
APH:
13.25
CSW:
4.25
APH:
$25.90B
CSW:
$1.08B
APH:
$9.67B
CSW:
$453.68M
APH:
$7.45B
CSW:
$211.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. CSW — Risk / Return Rank
APH
CSW
APH vs. CSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and CSW Industrials Inc (CSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APH | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APH | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.29 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
APH vs. CSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than CSW's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and CSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -25.35% | -38.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.45% | -20.10% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -13.84% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | — | — |
Volatility
APH vs. CSW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.97% | 40.13% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 40.13% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 40.13% | -12.30% |
Dividends
APH vs. CSW - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than CSW's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | 0.42% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
APH vs. CSW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and CSW Industrials Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APH vs. CSW - Profitability Comparison
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CSW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 308.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
CSW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported an operating income of 37.44M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
CSW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and CSW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for APH and CSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer