PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APH vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 27.74%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 43.12% annualized return.


APH

1D
0.88%
1M
23.40%
YTD
14.03%
6M
19.47%
1Y
63.73%
3Y*
57.45%
5Y*
36.37%
10Y*
27.74%

ANET

1D
4.37%
1M
16.03%
YTD
24.58%
6M
30.84%
1Y
70.45%
3Y*
57.04%
5Y*
48.31%
10Y*
43.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APH vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APH
Amphenol Corporation
14.03%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
24.58%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between APH and ANET is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.52

The correlation between APH and ANET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APH:

$198.36B

ANET:

$207.94B

EPS

APH:

$4.58

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

APH:

33.54

ANET:

55.91

PEG Ratio

APH:

1.12

ANET:

1.31

PS Ratio

APH:

7.62

ANET:

21.42

PB Ratio

APH:

14.19

ANET:

15.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$25.90B

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$9.67B

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$7.45B

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APH vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APH vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APHANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.50

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

5.20

+0.66

APH vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APH vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-52.20%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-28.33%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-50.42%

+22.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-50.42%

+21.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-52.20%

+14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-8.15%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-15.39%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

13.60%

-2.68%

Volatility

APH vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 15.50%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.50%

16.62%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.39%

40.79%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.68%

53.57%

-11.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.75%

47.23%

-16.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.93%

45.00%

-17.07%

Dividends

APH vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.54%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%

Financials

APH vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.62B
2.71B
(APH) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APH vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amphenol Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
61.9%
Portfolio components
APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APH and ANET have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to APH (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs ANET's -52.20%.

APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APH and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer