PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APGAX vs. QUASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APGAX vs. QUASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGAX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than QUASX's 19.60% return. Over the past 10 years, APGAX has outperformed QUASX with an annualized return of 16.31%, while QUASX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.60% annualized return.


APGAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.66%
YTD
5.59%
6M
4.68%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.31%

QUASX

1D
1.34%
1M
4.60%
YTD
19.60%
6M
18.62%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGAX vs. QUASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.59%12.96%25.09%34.66%-28.96%28.60%34.05%33.77%1.97%31.36%
QUASX
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio
19.60%4.85%18.49%17.83%-39.09%9.76%53.85%49.85%-1.02%34.71%

Correlation

The correlation between APGAX and QUASX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1992

0.80

The correlation between APGAX and QUASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APGAX vs. QUASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGAX
APGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
APGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
APGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QUASX
QUASX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
QUASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QUASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUASX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGAX vs. QUASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APGAXQUASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.32

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

8.56

-4.43

APGAX vs. QUASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the QUASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGAX and QUASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APGAXQUASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.47

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.12

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.57

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

APGAX vs. QUASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than QUASX's maximum drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGAX and QUASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APGAXQUASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.19%

-60.97%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-15.02%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

-31.68%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.04%

-47.37%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-47.37%

+13.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-2.83%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-15.75%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

4.05%

+0.09%

Volatility

APGAX vs. QUASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) is 3.20%, while AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that APGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APGAXQUASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

6.85%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

18.63%

-7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

23.69%

-9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.16%

26.34%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

25.55%

-5.88%

APGAX vs. QUASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than QUASX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

APGAX vs. QUASX - Dividend Comparison

APGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, while QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
10.71%11.31%7.44%1.75%0.97%8.04%2.87%3.66%9.96%4.09%2.74%9.23%
QUASX
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.07%9.86%18.20%19.70%9.29%2.32%9.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


APGAX and QUASX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUASX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to APGAX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGAX dropped -67.19% vs QUASX's -60.97%.

QUASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APGAX and QUASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer