PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APDFX vs. FSHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APDFX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FSHNX's 3.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with APDFX having a 6.45% annualized return and FSHNX not far behind at 6.19%.


APDFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.54%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
6.45%

FSHNX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.77%
YTD
3.22%
6M
3.96%
1Y
10.50%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
6.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
0.83%8.32%8.46%15.98%-10.57%3.99%9.67%14.84%-1.40%9.01%
FSHNX
Fidelity Series High Income Fund
3.22%11.17%8.75%11.25%-11.52%6.05%4.57%15.20%-2.14%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between APDFX and FSHNX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2014

0.83

The correlation between APDFX and FSHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APDFX vs. FSHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APDFX
APDFX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
APDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
APDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
APDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
APDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHNX
FSHNX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APDFXFSHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.79

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.02

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

26.31

-17.29

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the FSHNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APDFX and FSHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APDFXFSHNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.21

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.97

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.23

1.07

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

1.00

+0.13

Drawdowns

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APDFX drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FSHNX drawdown of -21.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDFX and FSHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APDFXFSHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.52%

-21.98%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.13%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-4.05%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-15.32%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.52%

-21.98%

+0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.11%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-2.42%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.40%

+0.21%

Volatility

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) is 0.89%, while Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that APDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APDFXFSHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.94%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

2.55%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

3.55%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

5.31%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

5.83%

-0.58%

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHNX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

APDFX vs. FSHNX - Dividend Comparison

APDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than FSHNX's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
7.07%6.86%7.27%7.39%6.34%5.41%5.42%6.94%7.17%8.01%6.70%7.48%
FSHNX
Fidelity Series High Income Fund
6.97%7.04%5.97%6.21%4.90%5.01%5.57%6.35%6.95%6.03%6.24%5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


APDFX and FSHNX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSHNX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to APDFX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDFX dropped -21.52% vs FSHNX's -21.98%.

FSHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APDFX and FSHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer