PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APDFX vs. CRDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APDFX achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than CRDOX's 2.03% return.


APDFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.94%
6M
1.66%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
6.46%

CRDOX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.49%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
0.94%8.32%8.46%15.98%-10.57%3.99%3.33%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
2.03%7.48%8.69%8.06%-10.62%2.66%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between APDFX and CRDOX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.73

The correlation between APDFX and CRDOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APDFX vs. CRDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APDFX
APDFX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
APDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
APDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
APDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
APDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDOX
CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APDFXCRDOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.74

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.12

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

13.85

-4.63

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the CRDOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APDFX and CRDOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APDFXCRDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.99

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.86

+0.28

Drawdowns

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APDFX drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, which is greater than CRDOX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APDFX and CRDOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APDFXCRDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.52%

-15.92%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.70%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-4.66%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-15.92%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-3.53%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.61%

0.00%

Volatility

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class (APDFX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APDFXCRDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.88%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

2.34%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

2.83%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

4.15%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

4.03%

+1.22%

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDOX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

APDFX vs. CRDOX - Dividend Comparison

APDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than CRDOX's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APDFX
Artisan High Income Fund Advisor Class
7.06%6.86%7.27%7.39%6.34%5.41%5.42%6.94%7.17%8.01%6.70%7.48%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
6.61%5.18%6.96%6.86%5.82%2.73%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APDFX and CRDOX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APDFX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to CRDOX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APDFX dropped -21.52% vs CRDOX's -15.92%.

CRDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APDFX and CRDOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer