APCB vs. DBND

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. APCB is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APCB returned 4.02%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DBND. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APCB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

APCB vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APCB achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.12% return.

APCB

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBND

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APCB vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	0.38%	6.87%	1.45%	1.57%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.12%	7.41%	3.06%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between APCB and DBND is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.93

The correlation between APCB and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

APCB vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APCB

APCB Risk / Return Rank: 36
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 36
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 36
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 37
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APCB vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APCB	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.35	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.02	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	1.55	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	4.58	+0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APCB vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APCB and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APCB	DBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.35	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.48	+0.20

Drawdowns

APCB vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APCB drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APCB and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	APCB	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-9.39%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.58%	-2.83%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.32%	-6.25%	+0.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-1.71%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-2.27%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.96%	-0.10%

Volatility

APCB vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.08%. This indicates that APCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APCB	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	1.08%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	2.33%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	3.30%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.84%	5.09%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	5.09%	-0.25%

APCB vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

APCB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

APCB vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

APCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than DBND's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	4.35%	4.35%	4.74%	2.22%	0.00%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.78%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APCB and DBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, APCB and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, APCB or DBND?

APCB has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to DBND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APCB dropped -6.42% vs DBND's -9.39%.

Which ETF is better, APCB or DBND?

On 3-year performance, DBND leads with 4.54% vs 4.02% for APCB. On fees, APCB is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, APCB or DBND?

Over the 3-year period, DBND has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, APCB or DBND?

APCB is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, APCB or DBND?

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.35% for APCB.

What is the main difference between APCB and DBND?

They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APCB and 0.50% for DBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.