PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Aperam S.A. (APAM.AS) and Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APAM.AS achieves a 53.88% return, which is significantly higher than IBE.MC's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, APAM.AS has underperformed IBE.MC with an annualized return of 10.23%, while IBE.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.


APAM.AS

1D
0.86%
1M
13.52%
YTD
53.88%
6M
64.92%
1Y
111.36%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
10.23%

IBE.MC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.09%
6M
9.80%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
17.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APAM.AS
Aperam S.A.
53.88%50.04%-17.32%19.08%-34.40%45.01%28.27%33.01%-43.94%1.73%
IBE.MC
Iberdrola S.A.
7.09%44.88%17.42%13.52%9.72%-7.61%32.72%36.69%14.06%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between APAM.AS and IBE.MC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.28

The correlation between APAM.AS and IBE.MC shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APAM.AS
APAM.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
APAM.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IBE.MC
IBE.MC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBE.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aperam S.A. (APAM.AS) and Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APAM.ASIBE.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.87

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

8.57

+5.20

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APAM.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the IBE.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APAM.AS and IBE.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APAM.ASIBE.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.84

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.95

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.85

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.52

-0.30

Drawdowns

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APAM.AS drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, roughly equal to the maximum IBE.MC drawdown of -71.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APAM.AS and IBE.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APAM.ASIBE.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.96%

-71.21%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-6.98%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.69%

-16.42%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.69%

-19.72%

-34.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-28.27%

-35.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.74%

+4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-16.76%

-15.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

3.17%

+4.82%

Volatility

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Volatility Comparison

Aperam S.A. (APAM.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.90% compared to Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC) at 3.85%. This indicates that APAM.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBE.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APAM.ASIBE.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.90%

3.85%

+6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.59%

11.14%

+22.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.77%

14.71%

+26.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.60%

18.57%

+17.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.06%

19.98%

+15.08%

Dividends

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Dividend Comparison

APAM.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than IBE.MC's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APAM.AS
Aperam S.A.
3.77%5.68%7.93%6.08%6.78%3.67%5.13%6.14%6.66%3.03%2.48%0.00%
IBE.MC
Iberdrola S.A.
3.46%3.49%4.23%4.22%4.11%4.05%3.42%3.82%4.65%4.83%2.52%2.20%

Financials

APAM.AS vs. IBE.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aperam S.A. and Iberdrola S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APAM.AS and IBE.MC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APAM.AS and IBE.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer