PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBE.MC vs. NG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IBE.MCNG
YTD Return5.22%-6.68%
1Y Return10.99%-34.64%
3Y Return (Ann)6.43%-30.04%
5Y Return (Ann)12.00%-2.05%
10Y Return (Ann)12.09%1.23%
Sharpe Ratio0.59-0.67
Daily Std Dev16.36%53.41%
Max Drawdown-72.78%-97.85%
Current Drawdown-0.36%-83.33%

Fundamentals


IBE.MCNG
Market Cap€76.83B$955.78M
EPS€0.91-$0.14
PE Ratio13.4213.46
PEG Ratio3.020.00
Revenue (TTM)€46.55B$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM)€20.20B$0.00
EBITDA (TTM)€15.09B-$22.42M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between IBE.MC and NG is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IBE.MC vs. NG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IBE.MC achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than NG's -6.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IBE.MC has outperformed NG with an annualized return of 12.09%, while NG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
849.02%
546.30%
IBE.MC
NG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Iberdrola S.A.

NovaGold Resources Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBE.MC vs. NG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC) and NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBE.MC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.53
NG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NG, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.97

IBE.MC vs. NG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBE.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the NG Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IBE.MC and NG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.69
-0.63
IBE.MC
NG

Dividends

IBE.MC vs. NG - Dividend Comparison

IBE.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while NG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IBE.MC
Iberdrola S.A.
3.44%3.42%3.34%3.28%2.77%3.10%3.76%2.07%2.04%0.37%6.25%5.75%
NG
NovaGold Resources Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBE.MC vs. NG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBE.MC drawdown since its inception was -72.78%, smaller than the maximum NG drawdown of -97.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBE.MC and NG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.62%
-83.33%
IBE.MC
NG

Volatility

IBE.MC vs. NG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC) is 3.94%, while NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) has a volatility of 18.05%. This indicates that IBE.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.94%
18.05%
IBE.MC
NG

Financials

IBE.MC vs. NG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iberdrola S.A. and NovaGold Resources Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. IBE.MC values in EUR, NG values in USD