PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Aperam S.A. (APAM.AS) and Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APAM.AS achieves a 53.88% return, which is significantly higher than AALB.AS's 42.65% return. Over the past 10 years, APAM.AS has outperformed AALB.AS with an annualized return of 10.23%, while AALB.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.93% annualized return.


APAM.AS

1D
0.86%
1M
13.52%
YTD
53.88%
6M
64.92%
1Y
111.36%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
10.23%

AALB.AS

1D
-1.23%
1M
10.29%
YTD
42.65%
6M
46.51%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APAM.AS
Aperam S.A.
53.88%50.04%-17.32%19.08%-34.40%45.01%28.27%33.01%-43.94%1.73%
AALB.AS
Aalberts Industries NV
42.65%-14.77%-10.34%11.34%-34.58%61.87%-6.23%40.74%-30.39%39.85%

Correlation

The correlation between APAM.AS and AALB.AS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.52

The correlation between APAM.AS and AALB.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APAM.AS
APAM.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
APAM.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
APAM.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AALB.AS
AALB.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AALB.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aperam S.A. (APAM.AS) and Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APAM.ASAALB.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

1.29

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

2.36

+11.42

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APAM.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the AALB.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APAM.AS and AALB.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APAM.ASAALB.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

0.85

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.01

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.16

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.38

-0.16

Drawdowns

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APAM.AS drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, smaller than the maximum AALB.AS drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APAM.AS and AALB.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APAM.ASAALB.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.96%

-84.14%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-22.08%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.69%

-44.75%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.69%

-51.28%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-58.29%

-5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.71%

+21.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-20.95%

-10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

12.16%

-4.17%

Volatility

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Volatility Comparison

Aperam S.A. (APAM.AS) and Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS) have volatilities of 9.90% and 9.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APAM.ASAALB.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.90%

9.44%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.59%

24.21%

+9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.77%

33.55%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.60%

32.58%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.06%

30.83%

+4.23%

Dividends

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Dividend Comparison

APAM.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than AALB.AS's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AALB.AS
Aalberts Industries NV
2.98%4.03%3.29%2.83%6.32%1.03%2.19%1.87%2.24%1.37%1.69%1.45%
APAM.AS
Aperam S.A.
3.77%5.68%7.93%6.08%6.78%3.67%5.13%6.14%6.66%3.03%2.48%0.00%

Financials

APAM.AS vs. AALB.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aperam S.A. and Aalberts Industries NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APAM.AS and AALB.AS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APAM.AS and AALB.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer