AOTS vs. XT
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
AOTS vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -7.20% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 17.55% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- -7.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 17.55%
- 1Y
- 34.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
AOTS vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -7.20% | -0.83% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 17.55% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and XT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XT
AOTS vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOTS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum XT drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -34.41% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -2.67% | -5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -7.36% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 17.48% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 21.05% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 20.09% | 0.00% |
AOTS vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.97% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and XT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: AOT and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.46% for XT.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer