AOTG vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. AOTG is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. Over the past year, AOTG returned 27.36% vs 147.03% for STHH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

AOTG vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 184.91% return.

AOTG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 27.36%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STHH

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 9.64%
• YTD: 184.91%
• 6M: 183.51%
• 1Y: 147.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	10.32%	49.07%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	184.91%	17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and STHH is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.54

The correlation between AOTG and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 29
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 81
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOTG	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.81	-1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.19	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.45	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	4.37	-3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	9.88	-6.49

AOTG vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-33.89%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	-33.89%	+11.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	-9.01%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-10.17%	+2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.09%	14.94%	-6.85%

Volatility

AOTG vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) is 12.25%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 25.53%. This indicates that AOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.25%	25.53%	-13.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.16%	41.17%	-20.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.87%	52.69%	-26.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.54%	51.44%	-21.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.54%	51.44%	-21.90%

AOTG vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTG vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.

Position	TTM	2025
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTG and STHH in my portfolio?

AOTG and STHH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOTG or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (25.53%) compared to AOTG (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, AOTG or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 147.03% vs 27.36% for AOTG. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AOTG has been the lower-risk option at 12.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOTG or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 147.03% return vs 27.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTG or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTG or STHH?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

What is the main difference between AOTG and STHH?

They also come from different issuers: AOT and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.