PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. TACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AOR vs. TACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AOR vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
-1.02%16.44%10.68%15.75%-10.08%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.74%10.93%11.76%7.43%-5.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than TACK's 1.74% return.


AOR

1D
1.95%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
-1.02%
6M
1.40%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
7.74%

TACK

1D
1.80%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.90%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AOR vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AORTACKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.01

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

1.50

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.49

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.58

7.15

+1.44

AOR vs. TACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the TACK Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and TACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AORTACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.01

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.57

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and TACK is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AOR vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than TACK's 1.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
2.57%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.25%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AOR vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than TACK's maximum drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and TACK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AORTACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-14.49%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-9.74%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-4.15%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-4.31%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.02%

-0.27%

Volatility

AOR vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) at 4.13%. This indicates that AOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AORTACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.13%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.49%

7.47%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

13.25%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

11.33%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.64%

11.33%

-0.69%