PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOR vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 12.46% return.


AOR

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.89%
6M
6.37%
YTD
6.86%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
8.14%
ALL TIME*
8.69%

AVDV

1D
2.02%
1M
-2.38%
6M
7.52%
YTD
12.46%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
6.86%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%5.24%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
12.46%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and AVDV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.81

The correlation between AOR and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AORAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.49

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

9.21

+0.17

AOR vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOR vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-43.01%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-13.19%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-14.17%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-28.08%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-4.39%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-6.72%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

3.56%

-1.99%

Volatility

AOR vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) is 2.49%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that AOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

4.98%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

14.58%

-6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.03%

16.73%

-7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.65%

17.38%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.65%

19.72%

-9.07%

AOR vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOR vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than AVDV's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
2.58%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOR and AVDV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to AOR (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 14.03% vs 6.68% for AOR. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.58% for AOR.

AOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOR and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOR and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer