PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOR vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AOR

1D
0.22%
1M
3.07%
YTD
7.96%
6M
8.80%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
8.46%

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


AOR vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOR
ASET

Technology

27.8%
0.2%

Financial Services

16.2%

-

Industrials

11.9%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

8.1%
12.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
1.1%

Energy

4.3%
7.8%

Basic Materials

4.2%
5.8%

Utilities

2.7%
12.8%

Real Estate

2.4%
41.6%

Technology

AOR
27.8%
ASET
0.2%

Financial Services

AOR
16.2%
ASET

-

Industrials

AOR
11.9%
ASET
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AOR
9.5%
ASET
0.1%

Communication Services

AOR
8.1%
ASET
12.1%

Healthcare

AOR
8.0%
ASET
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

AOR
5.0%
ASET
1.1%

Energy

AOR
4.3%
ASET
7.8%

Basic Materials

AOR
4.2%
ASET
5.8%

Utilities

AOR
2.7%
ASET
12.8%

Real Estate

AOR
2.4%
ASET
41.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AORASETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.48

AOR vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AORASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

Drawdowns

AOR vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

0.00%

-24.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

0.00%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

AOR vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

0.00%

+8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

0.00%

+10.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

0.00%

+10.67%

AOR vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOR vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOR and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer