AOR vs. ASET
AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - AOR tracks the S&P Target Risk Growth Index while ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. Both are passively managed. AOR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.
Performance
AOR vs. ASET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AOR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
ASET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOR vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 5.18% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% |
AOR vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOR
ASET
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AOR
ASET
Financial Services
AOR
ASET
-
Industrials
AOR
ASET
Consumer Cyclical
AOR
ASET
Communication Services
AOR
ASET
Healthcare
AOR
ASET
Consumer Defensive
AOR
ASET
Energy
AOR
ASET
Basic Materials
AOR
ASET
Utilities
AOR
ASET
Real Estate
AOR
ASET
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOR vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank
AOR
ASET
AOR vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOR | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOR | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AOR vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and ASET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOR | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | 0.00% | -24.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | 0.00% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility
AOR vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOR | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 0.00% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 0.00% | +10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.67% | 0.00% | +10.67% |
AOR vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOR vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison
AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.
AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOR and 0.57% for ASET.
Find the right allocation for AOR and ASET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer