AOM vs. NTSE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE).
AOM and NTSE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. NTSE is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on May 20, 2021.
Performance
AOM vs. NTSE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOM vs. NTSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.40% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 3.68% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 5.87% | 36.29% | 4.42% | 9.47% | -26.31% | -5.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than NTSE's 5.87% return.
AOM
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
NTSE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- YTD
- 5.87%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 37.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOM vs. NTSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AOM vs. NTSE — Risk / Return Rank
AOM
NTSE
AOM vs. NTSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOM | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.84 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.48 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.64 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.80 | 10.21 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOM | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.84 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.15 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOM and NTSE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AOM vs. NTSE - Dividend Comparison
AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than NTSE's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.99% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 3.13% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.44% | 3.22% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOM vs. NTSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum NTSE drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and NTSE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOM | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -42.84% | +22.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -14.20% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -10.58% | +7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -20.34% | +17.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 3.66% | -2.33% |
Volatility
AOM vs. NTSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) is 3.26%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that AOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOM | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 9.82% | -6.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 15.30% | -10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 20.34% | -12.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 18.75% | -10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.90% | 18.75% | -10.85% |