AOM vs. FASIX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX).
AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. FASIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992.
Performance
AOM vs. FASIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOM vs. FASIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.75% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 10.02% | 15.58% | -3.88% | 11.63% |
FASIX Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund | -0.58% | 9.58% | 5.34% | 8.00% | -10.20% | 4.04% | 8.62% | 10.64% | -1.63% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than FASIX's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has outperformed FASIX with an annualized return of 5.82%, while FASIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.
AOM
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
FASIX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOM vs. FASIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FASIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AOM vs. FASIX — Risk / Return Rank
AOM
FASIX
AOM vs. FASIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOM | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.73 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.43 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 2.31 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 9.30 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOM | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.73 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.90 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.09 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOM and FASIX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AOM vs. FASIX - Dividend Comparison
AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than FASIX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.00% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
FASIX Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund | 3.21% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.17% | 4.55% | 1.63% | 2.16% | 3.02% | 4.11% | 3.23% | 1.85% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
AOM vs. FASIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FASIX drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and FASIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOM | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -19.61% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -3.35% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.96% | -13.86% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.96% | -13.86% | -6.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -3.21% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -1.79% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 0.83% | +0.48% |
Volatility
AOM vs. FASIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 20% Fund (FASIX) at 1.94%. This indicates that AOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOM | FASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 1.94% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.88% | 2.96% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.23% | 4.61% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 4.99% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.90% | 4.60% | +3.30% |