AOM vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AOM (iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - AOM tracks the S&P Target Risk Moderate while ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. Both are passively managed. AOM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

AOM vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AOM

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 12.57%
• 3Y*: 10.68%
• 5Y*: 4.70%
• 10Y*: 6.41%

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOM vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	3.81%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

Return for Risk

AOM vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOM

AOM Risk / Return Rank: 65
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOM vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOM	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	—	—

Drawdowns

AOM vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOM	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.96%	0.00%	-19.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	0.00%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	0.00%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AOM	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.89%	0.00%	+6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.21%	0.00%	+8.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.94%	0.00%	+7.94%

AOM vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOM vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	2.99%	2.98%	3.10%	2.79%	2.27%	1.56%	2.02%	2.66%	2.53%	3.31%	2.14%	1.98%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AOM or ASET?

On fees, AOM is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOM or ASET?

AOM is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOM or ASET?

AOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between AOM and ASET?

AOM tracks S&P Target Risk Moderate, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOM and 0.57% for ASET.