PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOK vs. MKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AOK vs. MKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AOK vs. MKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF
-0.18%11.26%6.58%5.77%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
-1.48%8.07%12.15%8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOK achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than MKAM's -1.48% return.


AOK

1D
1.14%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.18%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
7.94%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
4.85%

MKAM

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
0.34%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AOK vs. MKAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MKAM's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AOK vs. MKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOK
AOK Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MKAM
MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOK vs. MKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOKMKAMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

1.23

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.71

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.02

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.50

7.08

+1.42

AOK vs. MKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOK Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the MKAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOK and MKAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOKMKAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.23

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.45

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between AOK and MKAM is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AOK vs. MKAM - Dividend Comparison

AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than MKAM's 3.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF
3.35%3.28%3.23%2.93%2.25%1.55%2.10%2.71%2.68%2.91%2.14%2.02%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
3.10%2.56%1.88%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AOK vs. MKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than MKAM's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and MKAM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AOKMKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-5.01%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.50%

-3.72%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-2.82%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-1.17%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.06%

+0.09%

Volatility

AOK vs. MKAM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to MKAM ETF (MKAM) at 1.96%. This indicates that AOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AOKMKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

1.96%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.24%

5.05%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

6.06%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.05%

6.28%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

6.28%

+0.40%