AOK vs. INCM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AOK (iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. AOK is passively managed, while INCM is actively managed. Over the past year, AOK returned 12.11% vs 15.73% for INCM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.

Performance

AOK vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOK achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than INCM's 6.45% return.

AOK

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.14%
• 1Y: 12.11%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

INCM

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 6.84%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOK vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF	4.26%	11.26%	6.58%	5.40%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	6.45%	13.07%	6.80%	5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AOK and INCM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023	0.72

The correlation between AOK and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOK vs. INCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOK	INCM
Technology	13.0%	2.4%
Financial Services	6.0%	8.2%
Industrials	3.6%	1.9%
Communication Services	3.4%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	1.5%
Healthcare	3.0%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	6.7%
Energy	1.5%	3.8%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.9%
Utilities	0.9%	4.9%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.0%

Return for Risk

AOK vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOK

AOK Risk / Return Rank: 61
AOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AOK Omega Ratio Rank: 65
AOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AOK Martin Ratio Rank: 62

INCM

INCM Risk / Return Rank: 89
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOK vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOK	INCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	3.01	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	4.49	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.57	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	4.95	-2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	20.86	-9.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOK vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOK and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOK	INCM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	3.01	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	1.51	-0.80

Drawdowns

AOK vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and INCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOK	INCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.94%	-7.84%	-11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.50%	-3.19%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.75%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-1.09%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.76%	+0.30%

Volatility

AOK vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 1.66%. This indicates that AOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOK	INCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	1.66%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.47%	3.82%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.76%	5.25%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.10%	7.23%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.71%	7.23%	-0.52%

AOK vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOK vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than INCM's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF	3.28%	3.28%	3.23%	2.93%	2.25%	1.55%	2.10%	2.71%	2.68%	2.91%	2.14%	2.02%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.08%	4.96%	5.06%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOK and INCM in my portfolio?

AOK and INCM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOK or INCM?

AOK has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to INCM (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOK dropped -18.94% vs INCM's -7.84%.

Which ETF is better, AOK or INCM?

On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 15.73% vs 12.11% for AOK. On fees, AOK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOK or INCM?

Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOK or INCM?

AOK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOK or INCM?

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 3.28% for AOK.

What is the main difference between AOK and INCM?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOK and 0.38% for INCM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.