PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOGIX vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Aggressive (AOGIX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOGIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AOGIX has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.75%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.


AOGIX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.08%
YTD
7.97%
6M
8.83%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
9.75%

SCHF

1D
0.54%
1M
5.58%
YTD
16.56%
6M
20.34%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOGIX
American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Aggressive
7.97%14.77%12.26%15.18%-17.29%13.87%18.17%23.79%-5.69%16.89%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
16.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AOGIX and SCHF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.89

The correlation between AOGIX and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOGIX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOGIX
AOGIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AOGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AOGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Aggressive (AOGIX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOGIXSCHFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

2.10

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

2.89

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.00

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.94

11.70

-1.77

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOGIX and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOGIXSCHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.10

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.63

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.90%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOGIX and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOGIXSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.90%

-34.87%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-11.48%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.40%

-13.41%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.21%

-29.14%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.68%

-34.87%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-7.38%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.95%

-0.96%

Volatility

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Aggressive (AOGIX) is 2.92%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that AOGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOGIXSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

5.73%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

13.32%

-5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

15.75%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

16.38%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

17.19%

-3.44%

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOGIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOGIX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

AOGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than SCHF's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOGIX
American Century Investments One Choice Portfolio: Aggressive
8.01%8.64%2.60%2.12%11.69%10.35%9.37%12.98%9.78%1.44%4.35%10.54%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.93%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOGIX and SCHF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to AOGIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOGIX dropped -46.90% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOGIX and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer