AOD vs. ATH.TO

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) and ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) are both stocks. AOD operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AOD returned 13.38%/yr vs 20.58%/yr for ATH.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AOD is traded in USD, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOD achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 39.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AOD has underperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 13.38%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.58% annualized return.

AOD

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

ATH.TO

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -9.28%
• YTD: 39.89%
• 6M: 40.02%
• 1Y: 74.64%
• 3Y*: 49.11%
• 5Y*: 55.47%
• 10Y*: 20.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	12.61%	32.14%	16.03%	12.65%	-17.15%	23.80%	8.12%	34.83%	-17.63%	35.37%
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation	39.89%	38.20%	17.84%	77.25%	90.45%	600.35%	-70.49%	-37.84%	-14.65%	-44.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AOD and ATH.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010	0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between AOD and ATH.TO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) AOD : $93.67M ATH.TO : CA$1.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) AOD : $252.71M ATH.TO : CA$518.18M
EBITDA (TTM) AOD : $55.11M ATH.TO : CA$505.02M

Return for Risk

AOD vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOD

AOD Risk / Return Rank: 87
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

ATH.TO

ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 89
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOD	ATH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.99	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.40	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.32	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	3.24	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	10.81	-2.22

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOD and ATH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOD drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOD and ATH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOD	ATH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.26%	-99.59%	+27.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.71%	-23.14%	+6.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-29.96%	+13.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.92%	-47.55%	+18.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.68%	-94.92%	+51.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-62.47%	+60.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.20%	-76.83%	+49.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	6.93%	-3.04%

Volatility

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is 5.22%, while Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that AOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOD	ATH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	13.05%	-7.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	31.88%	-18.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.99%	37.71%	-21.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	49.97%	-33.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	61.94%	-43.42%

Dividends

AOD vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison

AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	11.81%	12.00%	10.73%	8.56%	8.85%	6.75%	7.80%	7.71%	9.57%	7.29%	9.10%	8.93%
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOD and ATH.TO in my portfolio?

AOD and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.