PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOA vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOA vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.52% return.


AOA

1D
0.18%
1M
3.39%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.89%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.53%

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOA vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
10.13%19.59%13.55%18.27%-16.23%15.42%22.22%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.52%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AOA and SGOV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

-0.02

The correlation between AOA and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOA vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA
AOA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOA vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOASGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-272.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

195.55

-194.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

398.20

-395.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

4,462.00

-4,448.87

AOA vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOA and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOASGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

20.28

-17.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

14.74

-14.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

12.49

-11.80

Drawdowns

AOA vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOASGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-0.03%

-28.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-0.01%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.94%

-0.01%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

-0.03%

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-0.00%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.00%

+1.85%

Volatility

AOA vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOASGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

0.05%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

0.13%

+8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

0.20%

+10.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

0.24%

+12.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

0.24%

+13.30%

AOA vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOA vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than SGOV's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOA
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.04%2.18%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.26%2.15%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.86%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOA and SGOV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOA has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOA dropped -28.38% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, AOA leads with 9.19% vs 3.54% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AOA has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AOA.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.04% for AOA.

AOA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. AOA tracks S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOA and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOA and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer