AOA vs. ITDD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD).
AOA and ITDD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. ITDD is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 17, 2023.
Performance
AOA vs. ITDD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AOA vs. ITDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | -0.73% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 11.67% |
ITDD Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF | -0.11% | 17.66% | 13.08% | 12.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ITDD's -0.11% return.
AOA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
ITDD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOA vs. ITDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ITDD's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
AOA vs. ITDD — Risk / Return Rank
AOA
ITDD
AOA vs. ITDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOA | ITDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.83 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.82 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 8.16 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOA | ITDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.58 | -0.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and ITDD is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AOA vs. ITDD - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than ITDD's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.26% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
ITDD Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF | 1.83% | 1.82% | 1.56% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AOA vs. ITDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, which is greater than ITDD's maximum drawdown of -12.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and ITDD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOA | ITDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.38% | -12.46% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -7.56% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -4.86% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -1.28% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 2.10% | +0.08% |
Volatility
AOA vs. ITDD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD) at 4.83%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AOA | ITDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.83% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.33% | 7.50% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 13.23% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 11.44% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 11.44% | +2.07% |