ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and RUSG.L (Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while RUSG.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for RUSG.L.

Performance

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while RUSG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RUSG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

ANXG.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 19.88%
• 6M: 18.47%
• 1Y: 41.85%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 19.03%
• 10Y*: 22.61%

RUSG.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD	19.88%	11.70%	28.70%	48.00%	-25.42%	29.85%	43.37%	34.20%	4.47%	20.19%
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	23.38%	36.12%	-22.36%	30.68%	34.09%	30.13%	3.11%	19.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXG.L and RUSG.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.78

The correlation between ANXG.L and RUSG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANXG.L	RUSG.L
Technology	53.7%	49.3%
Communication Services	15.8%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	14.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	3.5%
Healthcare	4.2%	6.5%
Industrials	3.1%	3.5%
Utilities	1.4%	0.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	0.6%
Energy	0.6%	0.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	6.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANXG.L

ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANXG.L	RUSG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANXG.L	RUSG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ANXG.L	RUSG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ANXG.L	RUSG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.12%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	—	—

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than RUSG.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ANXG.L vs. RUSG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANXG.L nor RUSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANXG.L and RUSG.L in my portfolio?

ANXG.L and RUSG.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ANXG.L or RUSG.L?

On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANXG.L or RUSG.L?

ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for RUSG.L.

What is the main difference between ANXG.L and RUSG.L?

ANXG.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RUSG.L is Large Cap Growth Equities. ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RUSG.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.19% for RUSG.L.