ANGO vs. GRAB
ANGO (AngioDynamics, Inc.) and GRAB (Grab Holdings Limited) are both stocks. ANGO operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while GRAB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, ANGO returned -14.73%/yr vs -21.50%/yr for GRAB. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANGO vs. GRAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANGO achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly higher than GRAB's -30.06% return.
ANGO
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -9.16%
- 1Y
- 23.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- -0.81%
GRAB
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- -30.06%
- 6M
- -32.63%
- 1Y
- -22.27%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- -21.50%
- 10Y*
- —
ANGO vs. GRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGO AngioDynamics, Inc. | -3.50% | 40.17% | 16.84% | -43.06% | -50.07% | 79.91% | 7.81% |
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | -30.06% | 5.72% | 40.06% | 4.66% | -54.84% | -44.56% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGO and GRAB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
ANGO:
$515.37M
GRAB:
$15.50B
ANGO:
-$0.76
GRAB:
$0.09
ANGO:
1.63
GRAB:
4.25
ANGO:
2.97
GRAB:
2.38
ANGO:
$313.73M
GRAB:
$3.55B
ANGO:
$167.69M
GRAB:
$1.55B
ANGO:
-$6.81M
GRAB:
$481.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGO vs. GRAB — Risk / Return Rank
ANGO
GRAB
ANGO vs. GRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANGO | GRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.93 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.45 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.63 | -0.79 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANGO vs. GRAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGO drawdown since its inception was -83.04%, roughly equal to the maximum GRAB drawdown of -86.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGO and GRAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGO | GRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.04% | -86.46% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -49.30% | +20.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.47% | -49.30% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.98% | -86.46% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.12% | -79.54% | +19.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.82% | -67.38% | +19.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 28.07% | -13.56% |
Volatility
ANGO vs. GRAB - Volatility Comparison
AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) at 11.12%. This indicates that ANGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGO | GRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.94% | 11.12% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.41% | 25.26% | +10.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.08% | 37.92% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.88% | 59.94% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.93% | 60.39% | -12.46% |
Dividends
ANGO vs. GRAB - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANGO nor GRAB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ANGO vs. GRAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AngioDynamics, Inc. and Grab Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANGO vs. GRAB - Profitability Comparison
ANGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngioDynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.48M and revenue of 78.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.
GRAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 414.00M and revenue of 955.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.
ANGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngioDynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.76M and revenue of 78.42M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.
GRAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 75.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
ANGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngioDynamics, Inc. reported a net income of -8.08M and revenue of 78.42M, resulting in a net margin of -10.3%.
GRAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANGO and GRAB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANGO has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to GRAB (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGO dropped -83.04% vs GRAB's -86.46%.
ANGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANGO and GRAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer