ANGO vs. UBER
ANGO (AngioDynamics, Inc.) and UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. ANGO operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while UBER operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ANGO returned -13.33%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for UBER. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANGO vs. UBER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANGO achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -8.91% return.
ANGO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 39.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- -13.33%
- 10Y*
- -0.82%
UBER
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -8.91%
- 1Y
- -19.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- —
ANGO vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGO AngioDynamics, Inc. | 1.95% | 40.17% | 16.84% | -43.06% | -50.07% | 79.91% | -4.25% | -19.22% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -8.91% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 71.49% | -29.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGO and UBER is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ANGO and UBER has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ANGO:
$540.86M
UBER:
$151.51B
ANGO:
-$0.76
UBER:
$4.07
ANGO:
1.73
UBER:
2.91
ANGO:
3.14
UBER:
6.23
ANGO:
$313.73M
UBER:
$53.69B
ANGO:
$167.69M
UBER:
$22.03B
ANGO:
-$6.81M
UBER:
$5.85B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGO vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank
ANGO
UBER
ANGO vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANGO | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | -0.61 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | -1.01 | +3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANGO vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGO drawdown since its inception was -83.04%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGO and UBER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGO | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.04% | -68.05% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -31.46% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.93% | -31.46% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.98% | -60.43% | -22.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.87% | -25.64% | -32.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -25.68% | -22.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.02% | 18.97% | -4.95% |
Volatility
ANGO vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) is 12.28%, while Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a volatility of 12.94%. This indicates that ANGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGO | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.28% | 12.94% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.91% | 25.60% | +10.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.28% | 33.64% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.95% | 45.07% | +8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.93% | 50.63% | -2.70% |
Dividends
ANGO vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANGO nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ANGO vs. UBER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AngioDynamics, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANGO vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison
ANGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AngioDynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.48M and revenue of 78.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.
UBER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
ANGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AngioDynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.76M and revenue of 78.42M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.
UBER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
ANGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AngioDynamics, Inc. reported a net income of -8.08M and revenue of 78.42M, resulting in a net margin of -10.3%.
UBER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANGO and UBER have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBER has higher volatility (12.94%) compared to ANGO (12.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGO dropped -83.04% vs UBER's -68.05%.
ANGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANGO and UBER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer