ANGL vs. MNHYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and MNHYX (Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ANGL returned 6.27%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for MNHYX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for MNHYX.

Performance

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than MNHYX's 2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 6.27%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.65% annualized return.

ANGL

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 6.27%

MNHYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 8.44%
• 3Y*: 9.41%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series	2.68%	6.65%	9.63%	13.19%	-7.59%	9.99%	6.26%	13.99%	-1.30%	8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and MNHYX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012	0.46

The correlation between ANGL and MNHYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ANGL vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 52
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

MNHYX

MNHYX Risk / Return Rank: 88
MNHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MNHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MNHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MNHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MNHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANGL	MNHYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	3.18	-1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	4.83	-2.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.75	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	3.47	-1.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	15.57	-7.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the MNHYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and MNHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANGL	MNHYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	3.18	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	1.53	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	1.61	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	1.84	-1.10

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than MNHYX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and MNHYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANGL	MNHYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-19.70%	-9.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-2.51%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.48%	-4.43%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-10.84%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	-19.70%	-9.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	0.00%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-1.56%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.56%	+0.40%

Volatility

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) at 0.75%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANGL	MNHYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	0.75%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	2.12%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	2.74%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	3.70%	+3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	4.15%	+5.13%

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANGL vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than MNHYX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.37%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series	6.65%	6.95%	6.38%	6.66%	5.93%	7.93%	4.98%	6.63%	5.26%	5.16%	6.49%	5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANGL and MNHYX in my portfolio?

ANGL and MNHYX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANGL or MNHYX?

ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to MNHYX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs MNHYX's -19.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.