ANGL vs. LDRH
ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - ANGL tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index while LDRH tracks the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ANGL returned 7.26% vs 5.98% for LDRH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
ANGL vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANGL having a 1.97% return and LDRH slightly higher at 1.98%.
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
LDRH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.97% | 9.04% | -0.38% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 1.98% | 7.18% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and LDRH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ANGL and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGL vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank
ANGL
LDRH
ANGL vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANGL | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 4.88 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 20.18 | -12.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and LDRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGL | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | -3.17% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -1.23% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.26% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -0.24% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.30% | +0.67% |
Volatility
ANGL vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.61%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGL | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.61% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.55% | 1.97% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 2.61% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 3.48% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.26% | 3.48% | +5.78% |
ANGL vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ANGL and LDRH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
ANGL vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.35% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 6.99% | 6.41% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANGL and LDRH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANGL has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to LDRH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs LDRH's -3.17%.
On 1-year performance, ANGL leads with 7.26% vs 5.98% for LDRH. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 7.26% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ANGL and LDRH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.35% for ANGL.
ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.
LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANGL and LDRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer