PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANGL vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANGL vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has underperformed GSG with an annualized return of 5.83%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.03% annualized return.


ANGL

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
1.72%
YTD
2.53%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
8.23%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
5.83%
ALL TIME*
6.81%

GSG

1D
0.36%
1M
5.78%
6M
21.95%
YTD
32.52%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
8.03%
ALL TIME*
-2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$32.12M$23.27M$20.11M
$18.96M$16.42M$22.87M

ANGL vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
2.53%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
32.52%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and GSG is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012

0.21

The correlation between ANGL and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANGL vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ANGL vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANGLGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.00

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

6.32

+0.15

ANGL vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANGLGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.31%

-89.62%

+60.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-18.81%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-18.81%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-29.12%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

-57.64%

+28.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-59.99%

+59.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-63.67%

+60.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

5.94%

-4.96%

Volatility

ANGL vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.05%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANGLGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

8.99%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

21.89%

-18.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

24.44%

-20.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

22.90%

-15.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.23%

22.08%

-12.85%

ANGL vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANGL vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.52%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANGL and GSG have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to ANGL (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 10-year performance, GSG leads with 8.03% vs 5.83% for ANGL. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSG has performed better with a 8.03% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GSG is Commodities. ANGL tracks ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANGL and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANGL and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer