ANGL vs. FCVT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while FCVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. ANGL is passively managed, while FCVT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANGL returned 6.27%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for FCVT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FCVT.

Performance

ANGL vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FCVT's 25.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has underperformed FCVT with an annualized return of 6.27%, while FCVT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.

ANGL

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 6.27%

FCVT

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: 25.61%
• 6M: 25.00%
• 1Y: 47.07%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	25.61%	19.60%	11.92%	7.12%	-20.88%	4.23%	51.02%	22.30%	-2.28%	12.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and FCVT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015	0.48

The correlation between ANGL and FCVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

ANGL vs. FCVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANGL	FCVT
Financial Services	100.0%	0.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.7%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

ANGL vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 52
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FCVT

FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 87
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANGL	FCVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.97	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	3.76	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.50	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	5.58	-3.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	20.90	-12.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANGL vs. FCVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the FCVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and FCVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANGL	FCVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.97	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.54	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.83	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.68	+0.06

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and FCVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANGL	FCVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-31.79%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-8.47%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.48%	-15.06%	+9.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-30.43%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	-31.79%	+2.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-1.20%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-10.36%	+7.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	2.26%	-1.30%

Volatility

ANGL vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.37%, while First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANGL	FCVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	6.07%	-4.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	12.99%	-9.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	15.94%	-11.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	14.09%	-6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	14.85%	-5.57%

ANGL vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANGL vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than FCVT's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.37%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	1.19%	1.98%	1.30%	1.76%	3.71%	23.07%	1.72%	1.60%	1.85%	2.18%	1.88%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANGL and FCVT in my portfolio?

ANGL and FCVT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANGL or FCVT?

FCVT has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to ANGL (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs FCVT's -31.79%.

Which ETF is better, ANGL or FCVT?

On 10-year performance, FCVT leads with 12.36% vs 6.27% for ANGL. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ANGL or FCVT?

Over the 10-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANGL or FCVT?

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANGL or FCVT?

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.

What is the main difference between ANGL and FCVT?

ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FCVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 0.95% for FCVT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.