ANEW vs. UVXY
ANEW (ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF) and UVXY (ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index, while UVXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANEW returned 3.83%/yr vs -67.90%/yr for UVXY. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. ANEW charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UVXY.
Performance
ANEW vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANEW achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -19.06% return.
ANEW
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
UVXY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -22.10%
- YTD
- -19.06%
- 6M
- -37.37%
- 1Y
- -72.91%
- 3Y*
- -64.55%
- 5Y*
- -67.90%
- 10Y*
- -72.67%
ANEW vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF | 1.92% | 12.01% | 19.37% | 22.81% | -29.62% | 6.95% | 5.77% |
UVXY ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -19.06% | -65.32% | -50.90% | -87.70% | -44.81% | -88.33% | -36.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANEW and UVXY is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020 | -0.68 |
The correlation between ANEW and UVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.69 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANEW vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank
ANEW
UVXY
ANEW vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANEW | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | -0.87 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | -1.60 | +2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.82 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | -0.97 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | -1.31 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANEW | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | -0.87 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.66 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | -0.68 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
ANEW vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANEW drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEW and UVXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANEW | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.87% | -100.00% | +60.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.12% | -75.22% | +59.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -95.45% | +75.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.87% | -99.68% | +59.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -100.00% | +96.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -98.55% | +85.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.62% | 55.63% | -50.01% |
Volatility
ANEW vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is 3.09%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that ANEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANEW | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 11.77% | -8.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 62.64% | -52.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 84.42% | -71.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 103.85% | -85.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 113.82% | -95.02% |
ANEW vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANEW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANEW vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison
ANEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF | 0.61% | 0.54% | 1.08% | 0.87% | 1.05% | 0.24% | 0.04% |
UVXY ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANEW and UVXY have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UVXY has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to ANEW (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANEW dropped -39.87% vs UVXY's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, ANEW leads with 3.83% vs -67.90% for UVXY. On fees, ANEW is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ANEW has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ANEW has performed better with a 3.83% return vs -67.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ANEW is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.
ANEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.
ANEW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UVXY is Volatility. ANEW tracks MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ANEW and 0.95% for UVXY.
ANEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANEW and UVXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer