PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANEW vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANEW vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANEW achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -19.06% return.


ANEW

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.91%
YTD
1.92%
6M
0.88%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*

UVXY

1D
-0.24%
1M
-22.10%
YTD
-19.06%
6M
-37.37%
1Y
-72.91%
3Y*
-64.55%
5Y*
-67.90%
10Y*
-72.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANEW vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
1.92%12.01%19.37%22.81%-29.62%6.95%5.77%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-19.06%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-88.33%-36.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ANEW and UVXY is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020

-0.68

The correlation between ANEW and UVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.69 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANEW vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEW
ANEW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ANEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANEW Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ANEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANEW Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEW vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANEWUVXYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

-0.87

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

-1.60

+2.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.82

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.97

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.08

-1.31

+2.39

ANEW vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANEW and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANEWUVXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

-0.87

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.66

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.68

+0.96

Drawdowns

ANEW vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEW drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEW and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANEWUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.87%

-100.00%

+60.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-75.22%

+59.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.26%

-95.45%

+75.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.87%

-99.68%

+59.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-100.00%

+96.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-98.55%

+85.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

55.63%

-50.01%

Volatility

ANEW vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is 3.09%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that ANEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANEWUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

11.77%

-8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

62.64%

-52.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

84.42%

-71.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.81%

103.85%

-85.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

113.82%

-95.02%

ANEW vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANEW vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

ANEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
0.61%0.54%1.08%0.87%1.05%0.24%0.04%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANEW and UVXY have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to ANEW (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANEW dropped -39.87% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, ANEW leads with 3.83% vs -67.90% for UVXY. On fees, ANEW is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ANEW has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ANEW has performed better with a 3.83% return vs -67.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANEW is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

ANEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.

ANEW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UVXY is Volatility. ANEW tracks MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ANEW and 0.95% for UVXY.

ANEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANEW and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer