PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANET vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 59.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ANET having a 44.04% annualized return and IESC not far ahead at 45.24%.


ANET

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.19%
6M
30.44%
YTD
29.25%
1Y
51.50%
3Y*
58.03%
5Y*
49.14%
10Y*
44.04%
ALL TIME*
37.87%

IESC

1D
1.31%
1M
-12.82%
6M
34.98%
YTD
59.64%
1Y
89.83%
3Y*
121.98%
5Y*
65.53%
10Y*
45.24%
ALL TIME*
14.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
29.25%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
59.64%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and IESC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.28

The correlation between ANET and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANET:

$213.24B

IESC:

$12.37B

EPS

ANET:

$2.92

IESC:

$18.86

PE Ratio

ANET:

58.05

IESC:

32.93

PEG Ratio

ANET:

1.36

IESC:

0.40

PS Ratio

ANET:

22.24

IESC:

3.45

PB Ratio

ANET:

15.99

IESC:

11.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANET:

$9.71B

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANET:

$6.17B

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

ANET:

$4.21B

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANETIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

4.14

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

10.34

-6.57

ANET vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANET vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-98.32%

+46.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-21.80%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-49.23%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

-54.22%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

-54.28%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.42%

-18.98%

+9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-54.83%

+39.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.73%

8.73%

+5.00%

Volatility

ANET vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) have volatilities of 19.27% and 20.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.27%

20.14%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.64%

51.29%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.13%

64.97%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.99%

54.61%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.18%

48.23%

-3.05%

Dividends

ANET vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANET nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ANET vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arista Networks, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.71B
974.20M
(ANET) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ANET vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arista Networks, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
61.9%
24.5%
Portfolio components
ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and IESC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESC has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to ANET (19.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer