ANBIX vs. EIRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX).
ANBIX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010. EIRRX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010.
Performance
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy | 0.47% | 7.52% | 3.20% | 5.20% | -8.50% | 6.35% | 9.35% | 9.29% | -0.76% | 2.93% |
EIRRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund | 0.45% | 4.63% | 5.65% | 6.33% | -3.08% | 7.84% | 5.25% | 5.60% | -0.15% | 1.94% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ANBIX having a 0.47% return and EIRRX slightly lower at 0.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ANBIX having a 3.63% annualized return and EIRRX not far ahead at 3.76%.
ANBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 3.63%
EIRRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANBIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EIRRX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ANBIX vs. EIRRX — Risk / Return Rank
ANBIX
EIRRX
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANBIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.71 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.44 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.91 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 12.86 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANBIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.71 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 1.35 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 1.37 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.10 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANBIX and EIRRX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Dividend Comparison
ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than EIRRX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy | 4.57% | 4.93% | 3.86% | 4.55% | 6.47% | 4.70% | 2.22% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 2.05% | 2.13% | 1.61% |
EIRRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund | 4.11% | 3.57% | 4.08% | 4.50% | 5.07% | 3.54% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 2.91% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, which is greater than EIRRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and EIRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANBIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -10.27% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -1.18% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.85% | -6.22% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.56% | -10.27% | -1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.44% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -1.01% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 0.27% | +0.14% |
Volatility
ANBIX vs. EIRRX - Volatility Comparison
AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) at 0.69%. This indicates that ANBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANBIX | EIRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.69% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | 1.13% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 1.96% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.49% | 2.85% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 2.76% | +1.27% |