ANBIX vs. NVDA
ANBIX (AB Bond Inflation Strategy) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX returned 3.43%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
ANBIX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANBIX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 3.43%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.
ANBIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.31%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B |
ANBIX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy | 1.03% | 7.52% | 3.20% | 5.20% | -8.50% | 6.35% | 9.35% | 9.29% | -0.76% | 2.93% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANBIX and NVDA is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2010 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANBIX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
ANBIX
NVDA
ANBIX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANBIX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.65 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 1.32 | +5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANBIX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANBIX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -89.72% | +78.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.05% | -20.21% | +19.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.51% | -36.88% | +34.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.85% | -66.34% | +55.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.56% | -66.34% | +54.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -14.74% | +14.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -36.07% | +33.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 9.90% | -9.54% |
Volatility
ANBIX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) is 0.50%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that ANBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANBIX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 12.04% | -11.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 28.30% | -26.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11% | 36.41% | -34.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 51.87% | -47.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 49.95% | -45.95% |
Dividends
ANBIX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy | 4.78% | 4.93% | 3.86% | 4.55% | 6.47% | 4.70% | 2.22% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 2.05% | 2.13% | 1.61% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANBIX and NVDA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to ANBIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANBIX dropped -11.56% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
ANBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANBIX and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer