ANBIX vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

ANBIX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010.

Performance

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	0.47%	7.52%	3.20%	5.20%	-8.50%	6.35%	9.35%	9.29%	-0.76%	2.93%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-5.76%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANBIX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 3.63%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.75% annualized return.

ANBIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: 3.63%

NVDA

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: -5.76%
• 6M: -6.13%
• 1Y: 59.59%
• 3Y*: 85.01%
• 5Y*: 66.40%
• 10Y*: 69.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ANBIX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANBIX

ANBIX Risk / Return Rank: 78
ANBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ANBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ANBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ANBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ANBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 82
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANBIX	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.45	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.14	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	3.08	-1.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	7.73	+2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANBIX and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANBIX	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.45	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	1.29	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	1.40	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.61	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between ANBIX and NVDA is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	4.57%	4.93%	3.86%	4.55%	6.47%	4.70%	2.22%	3.19%	3.39%	2.05%	2.13%	1.61%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANBIX	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.56%	-89.72%	+78.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.09%	-20.21%	+18.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.85%	-66.34%	+55.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.56%	-66.34%	+54.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-15.10%	+14.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-36.40%	+34.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	8.05%	-7.64%

Volatility

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) is 0.85%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that ANBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANBIX	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	10.43%	-9.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.35%	25.79%	-24.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71%	41.42%	-38.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.49%	51.72%	-47.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.03%	49.84%	-45.81%