PortfoliosLab logo
ANBIX vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ANBIX and NVDA is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ANBIX:

2.00

NVDA:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

ANBIX:

2.96

NVDA:

0.84

Omega Ratio

ANBIX:

1.40

NVDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

ANBIX:

1.83

NVDA:

0.51

Martin Ratio

ANBIX:

7.20

NVDA:

1.24

Ulcer Index

ANBIX:

1.01%

NVDA:

15.09%

Daily Std Dev

ANBIX:

3.56%

NVDA:

58.96%

Max Drawdown

ANBIX:

-11.56%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

ANBIX:

-0.38%

NVDA:

-9.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANBIX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 3.38%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.01% annualized return.


ANBIX

YTD

4.16%

1M

-0.11%

6M

3.34%

1Y

6.83%

3Y*

2.62%

5Y*

3.81%

10Y*

3.38%

NVDA

YTD

0.63%

1M

21.07%

6M

-2.24%

1Y

23.29%

3Y*

93.53%

5Y*

72.51%

10Y*

74.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AB Bond Inflation Strategy

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ANBIX vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANBIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ANBIX is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ANBIX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ANBIX is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ANBIX is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ANBIX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ANBIX is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ANBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANBIX and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ANBIX
AB Bond Inflation Strategy
4.33%4.34%4.57%6.47%4.71%2.24%2.43%3.40%2.06%2.14%1.61%2.32%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ANBIX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) is 1.27%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.81%. This indicates that ANBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...