ANAZX vs. AWF
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF).
ANAZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. AWF is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 28, 1993.
Performance
ANAZX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANAZX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z | -0.85% | 6.42% | 2.70% | 5.99% | -12.17% | -2.14% | 5.13% | 7.84% | 0.38% | 3.18% |
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | -3.71% | 7.54% | 14.30% | 18.37% | -16.62% | 9.95% | 4.40% | 23.40% | -11.35% | 7.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAZX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ANAZX has underperformed AWF with an annualized return of 1.75%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively higher 6.13% annualized return.
ANAZX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
AWF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANAZX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANAZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ANAZX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank
ANAZX
AWF
ANAZX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAZX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.12 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 0.22 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.17 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 0.44 | +4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAZX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.12 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.38 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.41 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.31 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAZX and AWF is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ANAZX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison
ANAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than AWF's 7.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z | 3.73% | 4.89% | 3.67% | 2.53% | 8.39% | 2.73% | 2.64% | 3.71% | 3.17% | 2.53% | 3.27% | 4.06% |
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | 7.74% | 7.81% | 7.47% | 7.33% | 10.30% | 6.48% | 6.68% | 6.62% | 7.97% | 6.03% | 7.73% | 10.28% |
Drawdowns
ANAZX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAZX and AWF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAZX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -55.54% | +38.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -10.19% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.24% | -25.25% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.24% | -40.12% | +22.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -7.73% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -12.34% | +8.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 3.89% | -3.12% |
Volatility
ANAZX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) is 1.49%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that ANAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANAZX | AWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 4.54% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 5.85% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 11.30% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 11.97% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 15.16% | -11.44% |