ANAZX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
ANAZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z | -0.99% | 6.42% | 2.70% | 5.99% | -12.17% | -2.14% | 5.13% | 7.84% | 0.38% | 3.18% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -2.23% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAZX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ANAZX has underperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.77% annualized return.
ANAZX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANAZX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ANAZX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
ANAZX
PFORX
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAZX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.64 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 0.89 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 0.61 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 2.82 | +2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAZX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.64 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.31 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.90 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.25 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAZX and PFORX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
ANAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than PFORX's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z | 3.73% | 4.89% | 3.67% | 2.53% | 8.39% | 2.73% | 2.64% | 3.71% | 3.17% | 2.53% | 3.27% | 4.06% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.88% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAZX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAZX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -13.87% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -3.99% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.24% | -13.71% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.24% | -13.87% | -3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -3.69% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -1.95% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.87% | -0.11% |
Volatility
ANAZX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) is 1.47%, while PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that ANAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANAZX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 1.93% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 2.53% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 3.38% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 3.46% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 3.08% | +0.64% |