ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L
ANAU.DE (AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ANAU.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ANAU.DE returned 15.52% vs 23.01% for ISAC.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANAU.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAU.DE achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.21% return.
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 3.32% | 20.55% | 26.51% | 11.52% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.21% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 6.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAU.DE and ISAC.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ANAU.DE and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ANAU.DE
ISAC.L
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANAU.DE | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 2.61 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 10.50 | -9.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAU.DE and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAU.DE | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -33.82% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -8.77% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.01% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -4.63% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.19% | +0.89% |
Volatility
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) is 1.73%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that ANAU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANAU.DE | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 4.22% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 10.45% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 12.76% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 15.64% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 15.82% | +2.66% |
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANAU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANAU.DE vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANAU.DE nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANAU.DE and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
ANAU.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. ANAU.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for ANAU.DE and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for ANAU.DE and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer