ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE).

ANAU.DE and XNDX.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANAU.DE is a passively managed fund by AXA IM that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2022. XNDX.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 9, 2025. Both ANAU.DE and XNDX.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc	-5.82%	12.03%
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	-5.84%	-4.19%

Different Trading Currencies

ANAU.DE is traded in USD, while XNDX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XNDX.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ANAU.DE having a -5.82% return and XNDX.DE slightly lower at -5.84%.

ANAU.DE

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -5.82%
• 6M: -3.06%
• 1Y: 23.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XNDX.DE

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: -5.84%
• 6M: -3.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANAU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XNDX.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XNDX.DE

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD

ANAU.DE

AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc

Return for Risk

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANAU.DE

ANAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 68
ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ANAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ANAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ANAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ANAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANAU.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANAU.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	-0.38	+1.49

Correlation

The correlation between ANAU.DE and XNDX.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison

ANAU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

	TTM
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc	0.00%
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	0.12%

Drawdowns

ANAU.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than XNDX.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAU.DE and XNDX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANAU.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.35%	-20.11%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.86%	-17.87%	+10.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.08%	-11.75%	+8.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ANAU.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.85%	34.58%	-14.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	34.58%	-16.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.38%	34.58%	-16.20%